DIFFERENCES IN IMPROVING STUDENT PHYSICAL LEARNING OUTCOMES USING THINK TALK WRITE LEARNING MODEL WITH TIME TOKEN LEARNING MODEL

  • Darmawan Harefa Darmawan Harefa STKIP Nias Selatan
Keywords: Improvement, physics learning outcomes, learning of think talk write, time tokens

Abstract

This research uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method. The population this study all VII grade students SMP Negeri 2 Fanayama. The sample this study was class VII-A with a total of 22 students and class VII-B with a total of 24 students. The instrument used was a test of learning outcomes divided into two, namely the initial test and the final test. Based on the results of data processing that has been carried out and the calculation of the hypothesis test obtained tcount = 2.898 ttable = 1.68, then Ho is rejected and Ha accepted it can be concluded that there is a difference in the improvement of student learning outcomes using the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model with the Time learning model Token then the results the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model are more favored because this learning model can encourage students to develop and develop the ability to understand the physics material being taught and then write down the core of the material so that students can formulate the knowledge acquired in the language itself compared to the Time Token learning model

References

[1] Wena Made, Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara., 2010.
[2] D. Harefa, “EFEKTIFITAS METODE FISIKA GASING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA DITINJAU DARI ATENSI SISWA (Eksperimen pada siswa kelas VII SMP Gita Kirtti 2 Jakarta),” Fakt. J. Ilm. kependidikan, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35 – 48, 2018.
[3] Trianto, Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2013.
[4] Istarani, “58 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Referensi Guru Dalam Menentukan Model Pembelajaran,” Medan.: PT. Media Persada, 2012.
[5] A. Shoimin, “68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013,” Yogyakarta: AR-Ruzz Media., 2014.
[6] Huda, Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014.
[7] E. Gee, “KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA MELALUI ALUR BELAJAR BERBASIS REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME),” J. Educ. Dev., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 269, 2019.
[8] A. Majid, No Title. Bandung.: PT Remaja Rosdakarya., 2014.
[9] A. Z. 2013, Model-model, Media, dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual. (Inovatif). Yogyakarta: Yrama Widya,
[10] Rusman, “Seri Manajemen Bermutu Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru Edisi Kedua,” Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo, 2012.
[11] M. Kanginan., IPA Fisika untuk SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga, 2016.
[12] D. Harefa, “PENGARUH PRESEPSI SISWA MENGENAI KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU DAN MINATBELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM (Survey pada SMK Swasta di Wilayah Jakarta Utara),” Horis. J. Ilmu Pendidik. dan Lingusitik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 49–73, 2017.
[13] Purwanto., Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar., 2010.
[14] Sukardi, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan-Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara., 2009.
[15] N. Sudjana, Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung.: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.
[16] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta., 2012.
[17] S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2006.
[18] Supardi, Aplikasi Statistika dalam Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Ufuk Publishing House, 2012.
Published
2020-08-10
How to Cite
Darmawan Harefa, D. (2020). DIFFERENCES IN IMPROVING STUDENT PHYSICAL LEARNING OUTCOMES USING THINK TALK WRITE LEARNING MODEL WITH TIME TOKEN LEARNING MODEL. JURNAL INOVASI PENDIDIKAN DAN SAINS, 1(2), 35-40. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unwmataram.ac.id/JIPS/article/view/365
Section
Artikel