SIKAP SOSIAL DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF PESERTA DIDIK KIMIA SMA BERBASIS READING QUESTIONING AND ANSWERING DIPADU CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING

  • Y Apriana Peneliti Pendidikan Kota Mataram
  • S Wahyuningsih Peneliti Pendidikan Kota Mataram
  • Wawan Samudera Peneliti Pendidikan Kota Mataram

Abstract

Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan sikap sosial siswa kelas SMAN 8 Mataram masih rendah. Penerapan model pembelajran RQA-CPS dilakukan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan sikap sosial. Penelitian ini berjenis eksperimen semu dan dilakukan pada dua kelas yang telah diketahui homogenitasnya. Data kemampuan berpikiris kritis diperoleh dari nilai pre-test dan post-test dan sikap sosial dari angket. Data berpikir kritis dianalisis dengan ANACOVA menggunakan SPSS versi 25 dan data sikap sosial dianalisis secara deskriptif. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terjadi peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis (hasil yang signifikan dari skor pretest terhadap posttes untuk kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan hasil sebesar 0.000 untuk p < 0.01) dan sikap sosial peserta didik. Model pembelajaran krreatif terbukti mampu membuat aktivitas peserta didik di kelas menjadi lebih baik dalam aspek menerima pendapat teman, memaksa teman untuk menerima pendapatnya, memberi solusi untuk pendapat yang bertentangan serta dapat bekerja sama dengan teman yang berbeda status sosial, suku dan agama.

References

Maba, W. (2017). Teacher’s perception on the implementation of the assessment process in 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol 1, n. 2, pp. 1-9.

Taras, M. (2005). Assessment -Summative and Formative- Some Theoretical Reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 53, n0. 4, pp. 466-478.

Wardani, Astina1, and Susilo. (2018). Pengaruh Gender terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir kreatif Peserta didik SMA Program IPS pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1530—1534.

Anderson, L, W. (2013). Classroom Assessment: Enhancing the Quality of Teacher Decision Making. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.

Mkpanang, J, T. (2016). Influence of Creative Style and Gender on Students’ Achievement in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online). vol.7, no.12.

De Haan, R. (2009). The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education Technology, vol. 14, pp. 253-270.

Ofsted, P. (2003). Expecting the unexpected: Developing creativity in primary and secondary schools. London: Office for Standards in Education.

Best and Thomas. (2007). Creativity teaching and learning. London: Continuum.

Piaw, C, Y. (2010). Building a test to assess creative and critical thinking simultaneously. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 551-559.

Wang, Y. (2009). On Cognitive Foundations of Creativity and the Cognitive Process of Creation. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1-18.

Treffinger, Young, Selby, and Shepardon. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. Florida: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented University of Connecticut.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision. Processes,vol. 50, pp. 179-211.

Popham, W, J. (1999). Classroom Assessment. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.

Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2014.

Safitri, D. (2016). The Influence of Questioning and Answering Reading Strategies (RQA) combined with Think Pair Share (TPS) Against Learning Outcomes of Class VIII Students of Colomadu State Junior High School 2 in the Circulatory System Material for the 2015/2016 Academic Year. Education Journal of the Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. vol. 25. no. 7.

Hajiyakhchali, A. (2013). The Efects of Creative Problem Solving Process Training on Academic Well-being of Shaid Chamran University Studens. Near East University, Cyprus. vol. 2, no. 54, pp. 54.

Maftukhin, Dwijanto, and Veronica. (2014). Effectiveness of the Learning Model of Creative Problem Solving Assisted by Learning CDs Against the Ability of Creative Thinking. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Department of Mathematics, FMIPA, Semarang State University, Indonesia. vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 34.

Invone, J. (2010). Critical Thinking, Intelectual Skills, Reasoning And Clinical Reasoning. Retrieved,

Syazali, M. (2015). The Influence of Learning Model of Creative Problem Solving Assisted by Maple II on Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. Al-Jabar: Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 1, 2015, pp. 91-98.

Lubart, T, I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, vol. 13, pp. 295-308.

Mumford, K. S. Hester, I. C. Robledo, D. R. Peterson, E. A. Day, D. F. Hougen, and J. D. Barrett. (2012). Mental models and creative problem-solving: The relationship of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, vol. 24, pp. 311-330.

Treffinger, S. G. Isaksen, and K. B. Stead. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction (4th ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock.].

Samudera, W, Wildan, W, Hadisaputra, S, dan Gunawan, G. (2019). Development of Chemistry Learning Intruments Based on Reading Questiong And Answering Strategy Mixed With Creative Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1364 (2019) 012002I, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1364/1/012002.

Published
2020-08-10
How to Cite
Apriana, Y., Wahyuningsih, S., & Samudera, W. (2020). SIKAP SOSIAL DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF PESERTA DIDIK KIMIA SMA BERBASIS READING QUESTIONING AND ANSWERING DIPADU CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING. JURNAL INOVASI PENDIDIKAN DAN SAINS, 1(2), 30-34. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unwmataram.ac.id/JIPS/article/view/372
Section
Artikel